There are maestros and then
there are maestros. If I was speaking those words you would hear the subtle
accent on the second maestro. Christoph von Dohnányi is undeniably a member of
that upper rank.
German born Dohnányi has
enjoyed a stellar career with orchestras and opera companies all over Europe
and the US .
He is mostly remembered here for his long and productive tenure with the
Cleveland Orchestra in the 80s and 90’s. There he mentored several young
conductors including current New York Philharmonic Music Director Alan Gilbert
and one Michael Stern, Music Director of the Kansas City Symphony.
Stern was in the audience
for the Sunday performance to hear his old boss lead his orchestra in a
thoughtfully conceived program of three works that contrasted humor and hijinks
with somber reality. Opening the program was Alfred Schnittke’s absurdist tour-de-force
(K)ein Sommernachtstraum (Not a Summer Night’s Dream), followed by Richard
Strauss’ comic/tragic “Till Eulenspiegel”. The second half consisted of Tchaikovsky’s
Symphony # 6 “Pathétique”.
The full house Sunday
audience caught and appreciated the humor of Schnittke’s 10 minute homage to
Shakespeare’s cast of impish characters. Written in 1985 just before a near
fatal stroke, (K)ein Sommernachtstraum comes from his polystylistic period
(where basically anything was fair game) before his declining health turned his
music bleak and gray, making late Shostakovich sound like a Strauss polka.
The work begins with a solo
starting deep in the 2nd violins (Schnittke puckishly specifies the
musician occupying the back desk of the 2nd violins, technically the
farthest one from the Concertmaster’s position). Accompanied by piano, the
melody is so simple and sweet that one could be forgiven in thinking that
Mozart had been substituted without warning. Quickly taken up by flute and
harpsichord, the melody is subjected to gradual layering of dissonances and transformations:
a demented carnival ride waltz, a banal and amateurish Ivesian march,
shattering climaxes and hints of Schubert and Romantic excesses slide in and
out before the sweet melody returns to the flute and violin in glorious C
major… with just a hint of tolling, ominous bells.
Dohnányi was in firm
control, yet let the mayhem progress with wit and style. I heard many chuckles and noted frequent smiles from the audience. One fellow behind me exclaimed “I
really liked that!” For even more
bizarre Schnittke, find a recording of the Symphony # 1. I have never been able
to get through it.
Dohnányi’s Till Eulenspiegel
was a fine performance with vivid color, enabled by fine playing from all the
symphony sections, especially the essential brass and winds, but maybe a bit
too controlled. With amazing clarity and ability to coax all the virtuosity out
of the orchestra, Dohnányi and his forces brought out motifs and colors that I
have not heard in live performances before. Perhaps in emphasizing clarity he
underplayed some of the chaotic, skittering rhythms. The final funeral march
and execution was certainly dramatic enough, with powerful horns and solid
strings. I wished for a bit more scream from the shrill and Eb Clarinet as Till
was strung up on the gallows as it was swallowed a bit by the large forces. This
is an episodic work and Dohnányi verily mocked the stuffy academics, spun a lustily
brash love scene as Till flirted with all the girls and wrung the drama and
terror from the aforementioned march to the scaffold. I adore Dohnányi’s Cleveland recording with
Decca, so maybe I have that perfect performance imprinted in my head. With just
some minor quibbles, this one was really pretty close.
The second half Pathétique
was one of many outstanding moments; a fine paced, brassy march, an elegant
Allegro con gracia, and a deeply passionate finale. The opening movement began
with an almost perfectly inaudible bassoon solo by associate principal bassoon
Miles Maner (exactly what Tchaikovsky wanted, it is famously marked pppppp).
Brass intonation was a bit problematic here and in the rest of the symphony as
well. Although finely played, the first movement just did not seem to take off.
Again, as in the Strauss, it seemed to be Dohnányi’s penchant to control and
bring out detail. However, as the work progressed through its 4 movements, I
saw that Dohnányi correctly judged the subtitle of the work to mean
“passionate” not “pitiful” or hysterical”. This was a journey of many paths,
some taken, some abandoned, some more important than others. The hushed ending
was thus not a let down but a solemn and inevitable letting go. Noisier, more dramatic
and faster performances abound of this masterpiece, but few are as cogent and
ultimately satisfying as this mature and expressive performance.
No comments:
Post a Comment