This weekend’s Kansas City Symphony concerts were supposed
to be conducted by guest conductor Asher Fisch who for reasons unknown to me
did not make it. Thus Jeffery Kahane filled in an changed the program. Instead
of Mahler’s Blumine Movement from the Symphony # 1, Mozart Piano Concerto # 17
and the Brahms/Schoenberg Piano Quartet in g, we got a different Mozart Piano
Concerto (#25) with Kahane as solo and conductor and the Rachmaninoff Second Symphony.
Somewhat like the orphan “Blumine”, I was preparing a second “must hear” essay about it to go along with the earlier one about the Brahms/Schoenberg Quartet. Seeing it was now a moot point, I went no further than what you see below. Although the Kahane performances were quite good, I have a pang of regret that the KC audiences were not able to experience two rarely heard and wonderful works. The Brahms/Schoenberg essay was published earlier here but not on the KC Symphony Blog.
Somewhat like the orphan “Blumine”, I was preparing a second “must hear” essay about it to go along with the earlier one about the Brahms/Schoenberg Quartet. Seeing it was now a moot point, I went no further than what you see below. Although the Kahane performances were quite good, I have a pang of regret that the KC audiences were not able to experience two rarely heard and wonderful works. The Brahms/Schoenberg essay was published earlier here but not on the KC Symphony Blog.
Thus, as it is, I
submit my “Blumine”; a bit disjointed and unpolished, much like the work it
honors.
The Mahler’s first symphonic essay took a circuitous route
in both form and performance venue before emerging as the familiar and popular
Symphony # 1 in D major. The “Blumine”, to be performed by the KCS along with
the Brahms/Schoenberg Piano Quartet, was once a part of this symphony but was
discarded by Mahler after a few performances. After its rediscovery in 1966, it
has occasionally been performed as a part of the Symphony but more frequently
as a separate piece, as in this case. A little history lesson is in order so as
to understand how this movement disappeared for 70 years.
Mahler first conceived of this work as “A Symphonic Poem in
Two Parts” when it was premiered in Budapest
in 1889. “Blumine” (although not yet labeled as such) was the second movement
of this early form which is recognizable as the First Symphony but with many
differences in orchestration and some formal reorganization. This performance
was not well received and thus Mahler made some extensive revisions for a
second performance, this time in Hamburg
in 1893. Now titled “Titan, a Tone Poem in Symphonic Form”, the movement gained
the title “Blumine” (Flowers, or Flower Chapter) and remained as the second
movement. Mahler prepared an elaborate program for the piece; the first part
(current first movement, “Blumine” and the Scherzo) was called “From the Days
of Youth: Youth, Fruit and Thorns”. The second part “Commedia Umana” consisted
of the current “Funeral March” movement and the Finale.
Only a couple of performances were given of this version
before a 4th performance in Berlin
in 1896 where Blumine was formally struck from the score, all traces of the
program and the name “Titan” were
removed. The work was published in its current form in 1899 titled Symphony # 1
in D Major.
Blumine remained unperformed and lost until it was
discovered in a copy of an early manuscript donated to Yale University .
Benjamin Britten performed it soon after and the enterprising New Haven
Symphony under conductor Frank Brieff performed and recorded it, interpolated
into the definitive score as the second movement. Since then, several
performances have been given and recorded of the early Budapest
and Hamburg
versions.
So what of the music? Mahler biographer Henry-Louis de La
Grange was not too kind:
“There can be no doubt as to the authorship of ‘Blumine,’
and yet few other arguments can be stated in its favor. It is the music of a
late-nineteenth-century Mendelssohn, pretty, charming, lightweight, urbane, and repetitious, just
what Mahler’s music never is.”
Frankly, I kind of like the early versions with Blumine. Performing
much the same services as the Adagietto of the 5th, the short
interlude comes as a quiet, simple respite in the hothouse charged atmosphere
of the symphony. I do agree with de La Grange, it is a bit like Mendelssohn scored
with a decidedly late century palate. However it looks forward to Mahler’s
grander creations such as the aforementioned 5th and the 3rd’s
posthorn serenade.
Several fine recordings of the Symphony with Blumine are available, mostly including Blumine as an appendix, notably Zinman/Zurich Tonhalle on RCA and Neeme Jarvi/Royal Scottish Orchestra on Chandos. The 1883
No comments:
Post a Comment